Human Resources magazine and the HR Bulletin daily email newsletter:
Asia's only regional HR print and digital media brand.
Register for your FREE subscription now »
Activity trackers such as Fitbit, Jawbone, Garmin and others have become increasingly popular. However, according to a new study from the Duke-NUS Medical School, they are unlikely to help people become more active, given that most stop wearing the devices within a few weeks or months.
The study published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology recruited 800 employees from 13 organisations in Singapore and randomly assigned them one of the following groups:
- Control group (no tracker or incentives).
- Fitbit Zip activity tracker group.
- Tracker plus cash incentives.
- Tracker plus charity incentives.
The rewards were based on meeting weekly step goals of 70,000 over six months. One reward group accrued rewards in cash and the other had the rewards go to a charity of the person’s choice.
The researchers assessed physical activity outcomes, including steps and activity bouts, and health outcomes, including weight and blood pressure at study conclusion and after one year, six months after incentives were removed.
Findings showed that regardless of physical activity levels of participants before the study began, activity trackers alone or when combined with rewards designated for charity did not increase activity levels. In fact, nearly half of participants were no longer wearing their trackers by the six month assessment period.
In contrast, both active and inactive individuals who were offered cash rewards significantly increased activity levels between baseline and six months and nearly 90% continued to wear the trackers. However, at the end of twelve months, six months after the incentives were removed, this group showed poorer step outcomes than the tracker only group. This suggested that removing the incentives may have demotivated these individuals and caused them to do worse than had the incentives never been offered.
Despite the step differences, activity trackers, with or without incentives, did not lead to noticeable improvements in health outcomes.
The research noted inactivity is responsible for 9% of global deaths, reduces productivity, and drives up health care costs. For this reason, government, employers and insurers are looking for strategies to increase activity levels.
Yet, lead author of the study, Eric Finkelstein, stated: “Activity trackers alone are not going to stem the rise in chronic diseases. They could still be part of a comprehensive solution and there may be a role for low cost incentive strategies, although they would likely have to be permanent to avoid any undermining effect from taking them away.”
Other authors involved in the study included Benjamin Haaland, Marcel Bilger, Aarti Sahasranaman, Robert Sloan, Nang Ei Ei Khaing, and Kelly Evenson.
If your organisation is serious about employee health, join Asia’s largest discussion on corporate healthcare and wellness, Employee Healthcare Interactive 2016. For more information, contact Nikita Erpini, regional producer, email@example.com, +65 6423 0329.
Photo / 123RF